--- a/ImmutableString.st	Thu Jul 19 16:42:30 2012 +0200
+++ b/ImmutableString.st	Thu Jul 19 19:34:43 2012 +0200
@@ -58,19 +58,19 @@
 
 
     ATTENTION:
-	there may be still code around which checks for explicit class being String
-	(both in Smalltalk and in primitive code). All code like foo 'class == String'
-	or '__isString' will not work with ImmutableStrings.
-	A somewhat better approach would be to either add a flag to the object (mutability)
-	and check this dynamically (expensive) or to place immutable objects into a readonly
-	memory segment (the good solution). We will eventually implement the second in the future...
+        there may be still code around which checks for explicit class being String
+        (both in Smalltalk and in primitive code). All code like foo 'class == String'
+        or '__isString()' will not work with ImmutableStrings. Use '__isStringLike()' instead.
+        A somewhat better approach would be to either add a flag to the object (mutability)
+        and check this dynamically (expensive) or to place immutable objects into a readonly
+        memory segment (the good solution). We will eventually implement the second in the future...
 
     [see also:]
-	ImmutableArray
-	Parser Scanner
+        ImmutableArray
+        Parser Scanner
 
     [author:]
-	Claus Gittinger
+        Claus Gittinger
 "
 ! !
 
@@ -174,9 +174,9 @@
 !ImmutableString class methodsFor:'documentation'!
 
 version
-    ^ '$Header: /cvs/stx/stx/libbasic/ImmutableString.st,v 1.11 2012-04-21 16:01:10 stefan Exp $'
+    ^ '$Header: /cvs/stx/stx/libbasic/ImmutableString.st,v 1.12 2012-07-19 17:34:43 stefan Exp $'
 !
 
 version_CVS
-    ^ '$Header: /cvs/stx/stx/libbasic/ImmutableString.st,v 1.11 2012-04-21 16:01:10 stefan Exp $'
+    ^ '$Header: /cvs/stx/stx/libbasic/ImmutableString.st,v 1.12 2012-07-19 17:34:43 stefan Exp $'
 ! !